Friday, November 27, 2009

VaYetze "and he left"

My dear brother Paul Daniel mentioned last year that each of the Torah passages are sung within the synagogue. Of course, we don't sing the English passage, but I thought it might be fun to include a sample of this song (only 1 minute) for those who don't regularly make it to a synagogue service. To date, I have never attended a Messianic congregation where the Torah portion is sang in Hebrew. I have been to ones that were read, but so far, not sung. Enjoy.



VaYetze “and he left”
Genesis 28:10 - 32:3

Summary
A ladder to heaven
Rachel at the well
Jacob and Laban
Jacob’s children
The speckled and spotted sheep
Jacob’s departure

I have to admit, there some Torah portions which don’t have as much action, but this one is a really amazing passage. Each one of the segments that I mentioned above has enough material to dig into and enjoy. This passage also covers a number of years. In it, Jacob grows from a refugee with nothing to the great Patriarch that we come to know him as. This passage is also full of interesting speculation and imagination. The picture of Jacob’s ladder is the subject of much artwork.



In resent days I have read 2 books (novels) which cover this time period. Both have very different perspectives on the characters. Both surprised me by their brash almost irreverent look at the people and stories. Also, both were so engaging that they were difficult to put down.
The first was called The Red Tent by Anita Diamant and the second was called The Son of Laughter by Frederick Buechner
I am not really recommending either of these books, but just showing how this Torah portion has fired the imagination of many.

- How does one understand a ladder going up and down from Heaven? Why? What’s the point?
- What’s with the oil poured on a rock?
- How could Jacob get fooled into marrying the wrong gal after working for her for 7 years?
- Between Leah and Rachael, is one of them a good person, one bad, both good, both bad?
- Why does God allow Leah to have lots of children and Rachael so few? Why the whole “baby race” including 2 extra moms (a total of 4 women producing children for Jacob)?
- Does Jacob practice some type of “magic” to have all the good lambs and goats be speckled?
- Why would Rachael steal the household gods?
- My personal favourite, The Jacob family bumps into a camp of angels and we only get 1 verse about this? And related, did Jacob send “angels” to his brother to let him know they were on their way back home?

Maybe, when I am a white-haired old man I will have written on all the questions. Today, I will tackle just one. Maybe we’ll start at the first.

Jacob’s ladder
Jacob has left his father’s house, mostly out of fear of his brother, but also to acquire a wife in Haran. He travels and is exhausted and rests near a city called Luz. There is no indication that he actually stays in the city. He uses stones for pillows, so you get the impression he’s out under the stars in the nearby wilderness.
Although there is a lot strange in this passage, one of the things that is weird is the “stone situation”. In verse 11 there are several stones used for pillows. In verse 18, he has one stone, but they still use the word “pillows”. What happens to the stones? Of course, we don’t get a lot of extra help from the passage, but it has long been speculated (in the Talmud for example) that the stones were about him (perhaps as a little refuge), and as he slept they merged into one stone at his head. (Babylonian Talmud Chullin 91b.)
While Jacob slept, he sees angels. To be honest, Jacob sees a lot more angels during his lifetime then almost any Biblical character. He sees them here. He sees them at the end of this Torah passage. He (perhaps) sends angels to see his brother. He will wrestle with an angel. His life is full of angelic encounters. Most people who see angels are terrified, and in fact, Jacob is really concerned when he finally wakes (Gen 28:17). Yet, like the other passages with his angels they go with limited comment.
Jacob also hears the voice of God repeating the promises of Abraham. As I mentioned last week, Jacob “staying around the tents” got to understand the promises of God and the work of God through the ages. I have no doubt that he knew this was what God promised his Grandfather. He was part of the fulfillment. In fact, to date, there were very few “children” of Abraham on Earth. Jacob was the first big push in the children of Abraham being numerous like the dust of the Earth.
The is also something else which is important for this passage; “God’s opinion”. I don’t mean this to sound glib. In the whole last passage we have very little insight about what God thinks? Did God comment to Jacob about how he felt about buying the birthright for a bowl of stew? Did God comment about whether he accepted Jacob as the rightful lineage after he stole the blessing? NO. God is totally silent. Isaac seems to have accepted it, but God is silent. To be honest, who cares what Isaac thinks? We only want to know what God thinks.
Here we get the confirmation that God has chosen Jacob, and in the end, that makes all the difference. Shabbot Tov, Bradley Avi

Monday, November 23, 2009

Vayetze-Behold

sent from Rabbi Jack Farber-Congregation Melech Yisrael, Canada's oldest Messianic Congregation

"Divine Confirmation"


Parashat HaShavua VaYeitzei / Behold

This Week's Reading List:
BeReshit / Genesis 28:10-32:2
Hoshea / Hosea 13:6-14:10
Yochanan / John 1:43-51

Bereshit {29:9} While he was yet speaking with them, Rachel came with her av's (fathers) sheep, for she kept them. {29:10} It happened, when Ya'akov (Jacob) saw Rachel bat (daughter of) Lavan, his em's (mother's) brother, and the sheep of Lavan, his em's brother, that Ya'akov went near, and rolled the stone from the well's mouth, and watered the flock of Lavan his em's brother. {29:11} Ya'akov kissed Rachel, and lifted up his voice, and wept. {29:12} Ya'akov told Rachel that he was her av's brother, and that he was Rivkah's son. She ran and told her av.

The verse that caught my attention from this portion of Scripture, which was taken from this week's Parasha, was:

Bereshit {29:11} “Ya'akov kissed Rachel, and lifted up his voice, and wept.”

It always intrigued me as to why Ya'acov cried after kissing Rachel. First, taking into consideration ancient Middle Eastern protocols between unmarried couples, this was not a passionate romantic kiss. It was, I am certain, the type of kiss Shaul suggested believers in Yeshua HaMashiach greet each other with; much like the French or Russians kiss when they greet each other.

Romim (Romans) {16:16} Greet one another with a holy kiss.

I interpret a holy kiss to be a peck, mostly into the air, on either or both cheeks without having any lower body contact. This was the type of kissing that was most common during that period among Semitic people, a custom that seems to have carried over into the first century. So, this being the case then Ya'acov would have given her a holy kiss when he met Rachel for the first time.

However, why did he lift up of his voice and cry out? Most people suggest that he was love struck at that very instant, but I do not see it that way. I see it more like this: Has G-d ever spoken to you and you have doubted that you actually heard from G-d, but then He gave you some type of confirmation that it was truly Him that you heard from? Yes, this is what I believe happened with Ya'acov. In his dream a day earlier Ya'acov saw HaShem standing at the top of this ladder that extended from earth to heaven. From that position HaShem said:

Bereshit {28:13} Behold, HaShem stood above it, and said, "I am HaShem, the G-D of Avraham (Abraham) your av, and the G-D of Yitzchak (Issac). The land whereon you lie, to you will I give it, and to your seed. {28:14} Your seed will be as the dust of the earth, and you will spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south. In you and in your seed will all the families of the earth be blessed. {28:15} Behold, I am with you, and will keep you, wherever you go, and will bring you again into this land. For I will not leave you, until I have done that which I have spoken of to you."

This was quite the promise and I am sure Ya'acov was impressed by the dream, but I am sure he also had his doubts that it was actually a prophetic dream, that it was true and that it was actually HaShem that was speaking to him. I would have my doubts as well as I am sure you would too.

How do I know that Ya'acov had his doubts? I know by what he said the very next morning after the dream:

Bereshit {28:18} Ya'akov rose up early in the morning, and took the stone that he had put under his head, and set it up for a pillar, and poured oil on the top of it. {28:19} He called the name of that place Beit-El (House of G-d), but the name of the city was Luz at the first. {28:20} Ya'akov vowed a vow, saying, "If G-D will be with me, and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat, and clothing to put on, {28:21} so that I come again to my av's house in shalom (peace), and HaShem will be my G-D, {28:22} then this stone, which I have set up for a pillar, will be G-D's house. Of all that you will give me I will surely give the tenth to you."

Did you notice the “IF” in verse 20? This tells me that Ya'acov did doubt his dream! Sure he did and like I said you and I would have as well. However, HaShem was not going to let Ya'acov go through his life doubting; He gave him confirmation that it was Him he had heard.

Ya'acov was running from his brother Esav, was heading to strange unfamiliar territory and was looking for someone he never met and therefore did not know. Where would he start looking for his mother's brother? What could he expect to encounter when he did meet him? Would they even receive him? All these questions and more, I am sure, were running through Ya'acov's mind. Then he stumbled upon a well, but not just any old well. I am sure there were many in the area of this city, but this well was the exact well where Lavan had his daughter Rachel water their sheep. An accident, a happenchance, I doubt it! This was from the L-rd and Ya'acov knew it! The kiss he planted on Rachel was a kiss of joy that HaShem had confirmed his promise and the lifting up of his voice was him praising HaShem for the conformation He gave him by this encounter. Now Ya'acov knew that he had heard right, that he had heard from G-d. From here on in he knew his destiny because all of HaShem promises are “Yea and Amen!!!”

Korintim Bet (2 Corinthians) {1:20} For all the promises of G-d in him are yea, and in Him Amen, unto the glory of G-d by us.

*********************
Baruch HaShem
Rabbi Ya'acov Farber

Hallelujah for our Lord, our Teacher,our Rabbi, "YESHUA" King Messiah for ever and ever!!!

Saturday, November 21, 2009

A little video for Children-Toledot (Generations)

This 8 1/2 minute video I found on You Tube and a fun way to let the children visualize the story of Jacob and Esau. Shabbot Tov, Bradley Avi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGmfxRNdauY

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Toledot- Generations

Toldot
Genesis 25:19-28:9

This Torah passage is covers a very well known Bible story.

It is the birth of Jacob and Esau, their relationship with their parents, their growing up, the taking of the birthright from Esau, and the blessing. In the end, Jacob runs off to the north and will get married while Esau marries a third wife the daughter of Ishmael.

Many messages have been written about these stories, and in fact they are worthy of a great deal of study, but I will center in on just a couple items of note; specifically the character of the two.

Esau
-

These two are twins (as our story reveals). I have always held a fascination for me. The identical twin is God’s equal vent of a human photocopy produced at the same time. It was this concept of identical twins that inspired the medical possibility of cloning. Identical twins are born identical and are generally born into the same home, so they are raised in the same environment. These twins will often find different ways to differentiate each other. One might become successful in sports while the other in music. One might become and introvert while the other an extrovert. They often find ways to adjust their appearance so people recognise them from their sibling. Yet, their lives are walking experiments about how the same person (genetically) can live out two different lives.
The non-identical twins are also interesting. These non-identical twins are the same as siblings who would have grown up in different environments separated by years except that their birth happened at the same moment. My eldest son, grew up with a couple of parents in their twenties. It was just us 3. I was a grad school student living on a Seminary campus. We lived in a trailer, which was a very modest home for the three of us. Today, my wife is expecting with our 8th child. This child will enter a world with 5 brothers and 2 sisters. His father will be 39 before he/she is born. I am retired, and we live in a mortgage free home in a small town in Saskatchewan. Josh and baby 8 are raised in two very different worlds. This is understandable. Siblings separated by years don’t grow up in the same environment.
Now, back to our story. These people will be two separate nations. Jacob (Yisrael) and Esau (Edom). These nations will be antagonistic. These babies did not look alike.
When I first taught this story to my own family the first year we became Torah observant, I grabbed a couple of my children’s’ to act as my “babies”. The first one, I used Elmo (from Sesame Street) and that was my Esau. The second one was a plastic baby doll (they used to call these Kewpie dolls) that was Jacob. Now years later, I still see them that way and I think my children do as well.
Esau was the first born. He became a the big strong outdoorsmen. He was a hunter, and man’s man! No doubt, Isaac favoured Esau.
The sages also have something else to say about Esau:

Isaac loved Esau because [his] game was in his mouth (25:28)
Esau would deceive him with his mouth. He would inquire of him: "Father, how does one tithe salt? Father, how does one tithe straw?" And Isaac would muse: "This son of mine, how diligent he is in the fulfillment of the commandments!"
(Midrash Tanchuma; Rashi)

Now, I can’t confirm that this is actually the way Esau was, but this is the way he is cast among the ancient scholars.

His actions of throwing away his birthright for some food, choosing his own wives against the family custom, desiring to kill his brother after his father dies, paint a character of the basest quality. He is almost seen as a mass of selfishness. His is a victim of his own hypothalamus. He is the opposite of “self control”. He is the picture of self gratification. His is in stark contrast to the man who would become “Israel”.

Jacob-


Now Jacob is a different cut. He is a quiet (or innocent) man (depending on your translation), who lived among the tents. I have to admit when I first read this I didn’t admire him much for this. What, he’s some sort of wimp? (no, he really wasn’t, he’ll later wrestle with an angel). I actually sort of saw him the way people talk about their neighbours when they found out the neighbours are being arrested as an axe murder. “yes,” they would say, “nice fella, but definitely a quiet man pretty much kept to himself.” (not a pretty image)

Yet, my perspective on this changed a few years ago as I did some math.

Gen 21:5 And Abraham was a hundred years old, when his son Isaac was born unto him.

Gen 25:7 And these are the days of the years of Abraham's life which he lived, a hundred threescore and fifteen years. (175 years)

Gen 24:1 And Abraham was old, and well stricken in age

Gen 25:26 And after that came forth his brother, and his hand had hold on Esau's
heel. And his name was called Jacob. And Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them. (60 years)

From these last few passages you can see that Jacob, if he were the kind of man who “hung around the tents” would have had the chance to hear and learn from Abraham who would have still been alive until he was about 15.

Esau would not. He’s out in the forest doing manly things.
However, the story get better.

There is another character who is still alive as well.

The entire direct line of descent from Noah down to Abraham's father was still alive up until Abraham was 49 years old, and Noah did not die until Abraham was 60 years old. Abraham left Haran with Lot only 15 years after Noah died, and Shem was still alive when Abraham finally died 100 years after that. Shem did not die until Jacob (Israel) was 50 years old. Here we find a very important bit of information. Abraham may have received historical information directly from Noah while Jacob could have gathered historical facts directly from Shem. This leaves us with Jacob, the father of the nation of Israel, as having only third-hand knowledge, second-hand knowledge, first-hand knowledge or direct eyewitness knowledge of all the history of mankind from the creation through to his day

Where was Esau? Hmmmmm, I guess he must have been out in the fields. Too bad. That’s not a chance he’d ever get back the learning opportunity.

This contact with these people I believe shaped completely different characters.

Jacob, understood the work God was doing. He saw the importance of the “firstborn”, and he also knew History that biology is not the only criteria for this spiritual lineage. (Shem was the second born, and Isaac had at least one older brother). He could usurp his brother in this, and in fact, it was his duty an honour to be a part of the Godly lineage. It would be terrible to let the centuries of God’s work fall into someone who had no regard for it. (quoted from the electronic Biblical Commentary)

Now the taking of the birthright:

The ancient sages believe that there is something important about what Jacob was doing

Jacob cooked pottage (25:29)
That was the day on which Abraham died, and Jacob made a broth of lentils to comfort his father Isaac.
Why lentils? Just as the lentil has no mouth, so is the mourner speechless... Just as the lentil is round, so mourning comes round to all the inhabitants of this world.
(The Talmud)

It is uncertain how this bit of knowledge is arrived at but if it is true then it makes the event all the more dramatic.
Into this scene of kindness and sorrow for the death of the great patriarch walks the brash
Esau. Is he mourning? No, he’s hunting. He sees the lentils and broth (still popular in the Mideast) and asks for it. Jacob sees this as the opportunity to usurp his brother.

It is assumed that Esau knew what he was doing. The right of the firstborn would mean that he would receive a double portion of the inheritance at the death of his father. It would also mean that there would be a higher level of responsibility to care for surviving family members. The firstborn was seen as the “future leader” of the household (dynasty). Esau had no regard for this. In fact, he hated this whole situation. In fact, the Bible says, “…So Esau despised his birthright.”

Esau, says he’s no need for the birthright because he was dying. I have never read anywhere that anyone seems to believe this. Jacob asks him to swear to his loss of the birthright. The author of the passage makes it clear. Esau swears, not after he gets the meal, but before. He’s so quick to be rid of the birthright, but just so that you can see the contract is complete, Jacob gives him some bread and the lentils. Jacob has seen that he (who had much higher regard) for being a part of the lineage of God’s work, now was placed in that lineage. If he could take the blessing of the firstborn, that would make it complete.

The next chapter is really about Isaac’s adventures, but it does end with a section about Esau. He’s 40 years old now, apparently later then when he lost his birthright (I suggested 15 years old he lost the birthright).
Gen 26:34 And when Esau was forty years old he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Basemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite.

Just the wording of this verse, without the next sentence shows us that Esau is on his own path. He wants a wife. He takes one. He wants two, no problem. Supposedly, he knows the story of how his mother and father met. He knows that Abraham did not want his family to marry among the locals. Great effort was made to make sure Isaac didn’t marry one of those. Yet, Esau has a desire and he acts. Are his parents involved? Not according to this passage. Anyone who knows anything about ancient mid-Eastern culture knows that this is outside the norms. Even today, marriage is a family event.

Although, I am not completely sold on the modern Christian courtship concept, I have to acknowledge that is much more closely matches what we see among God’s people in marriage. Esau has no regard for this.

This concept is punctuated by the last verse of the passage.

Gen 26:35 And they were a grief of mind unto Isaac and to Rebekah.

The Blessing of the Firstborn


Isaac is old. He doesn’t see well. He is roughly (within 5 years) of the age his mother was when she died. For some reason, he thinks this event could happen very soon, and he calls his favourite son to do a duty for him and then Isaac can bless him.

A question should be asked here. It’s pretty well established the character of Esau. Why would Isaac bless this base character who has so little regard to the things which are important to the family? Specifically, their God, their history, and their promise? Also, you see from the blessing given that it’s a dramatic blessing. It’s a good one. He is not obligated
To bless the oldest. In fact, he actually doesn’t bless the oldest. Why?

In truth, we really don’t know. Some have speculated that Isaac, was acting against God’s will. Isaac still saw Esau as his favourite, and was going to act regardless whether God was his choice of not. Some suggest, that Isaac may have found common ground in Esau’s pleasure seeking style. The word choice does almost suggest that. Perhaps, Isaac thought that a good blessing would put Esau back on the straight and narrow. We don’t have the information.

Rebecca, overhears this offer and is quick to help her son steal this blessing. She is so sincere in her desire for this that she is willing to accept a curse instead of Jacob just to be sure her son get’s this blessing. She gets Jacob to dress as Esau. She cooks the food. She disguises Jacob. She tells him what to do and calms his fears and protests. In no other passage is Rebecca seen as so intent to carry on the theft. Her life (and the future of the kingdom of God) so it would seem depends on her success.

Jacob arrives dressed so only a blind man could be fooled. Isaac senses this isn’t right. How could this happen so fast? Jacob answered in his best Esau attempt “Because Jehovah thy God sent me good speed.” Esau did not have this God as his, so Jacob attempts to talk that way. Of course, when Esau does arrive he never mentions this God. He’s married to a couple of idol worshippers. Isaac still seeks to confirm which son he really has. He feels and smells his son. The moment of truth. Isaac believes it is Esau.

The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau (27:22)

"The voice is the voice of Jacob" -- no prayer is effective unless the descendants of Jacob have a part in it. "The hands are the hands of Esau" -- no war is successful unless the descendants of Esau have a part in it.
(The Talmud)
The blessing:
See, the smell of my son Is as the smell of a field which Jehovah hath blessed.
Gen 27:28 And God give thee of the dew of heaven, And of the fatness of the earth, And plenty of grain and new wine.
Gen 27:29 Let peoples serve thee, And nations bow down to thee. Be lord over thy brethren, And let thy mother's sons bow down to thee. Cursed be every one that curseth thee, And blessed be every one that blesseth thee.

So, what is the importance of a blessing? We live in a Western culture which doesn’t have the same regard for blessings and I think that is to our own shame. From my earliest days as a father, I have regularly tried to “bless” my children (and I have 7, very soon to be 8). I pray benefits into their lives. I ask God to shape and mold them into the people that he desires. At the start of every Sabbath, the children know that there will be a time of blessing for each of the children before each other and by name individually. In all honesty, I can’t tell you whether it does do anything. Time may tell that, but our Biblical fathers did it, and I think we miss an opportunity if we chose not to act in the same path. If God intended this to be a way of passing on eternal benefits, it would be a terrible shame to miss that opportunity and walk as practical atheists.

Jacob leaves and Esau arrives. The deception is revealed. Esau begs for some sort of blessing. Isaac offers some “weak blessing”. In fact, it’s almost a curse. This, by the way, would have been the only blessing he would have offered for Jacob. Isaac says his blessing to Jacob left no room for any benefit to the other son.

Esau decides that he’ll wait and then just kill Jacob. Rebecca again intercedes and has Isaac send him off to find a wife from the place where Rebecca (and Abraham) would be from. Isaac again blesses Jacob. This time knowing who he is blessing and you get the impression that he understands the “why” Jacob would pull this deception. In fact, the tone of this final departure shows no sign of anger. Jacob is God’s man. Esau is not. Isaac charges him and sends him away.

Esau, still not understanding the situation, but seeing his wife choice did not please his family he seeks his uncle and takes a 3rd wife. This one is Ishmael’s daughter. Still no sense that this pleased Isaac or Rebecca.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Toldot-generations

From Congregation Melech Yisrael- Toronto, Ontario




Parashat HaShavua Toldot / Generations

This Week's Reading List:
BeReshit / Genesis 25:19-28:9
Mal'achi / Malachi 1:1-2:7
Romim / Romans 9:6-13

Bereshit {25:27} The boys grew. Esav (Easu) was a skilful hunter, an ish (man) of the field. Ya'akov (Jacob) was a quiet man, living in tents. {25:28} Now Yitzchak (Issac) loved Esav, because he ate his venison. Rivkah (Rebekah) loved Ya'akov. {25:29} Ya'akov boiled stew. Esav came in from the field, and he was famished. {25:30} Esav said to Ya'akov, "Please feed me with that same red stew, for I am famished." Therefore his name was called Edom (Red) {25:31} Ya'akov said, "First, sell me your birthright." {25:32} Esav said, "Behold, I am about to die. What good is the birthright to me?" {25:33} Ya'akov said, "Swear to me first." He swore to him. He sold his birthright to Ya'akov. {25:34} Ya'akov gave Esav bread and stew of lentils. He ate and drank, rose up, and went his way. So Esav despised his birthright.

How hungry could Esav have been so as to be at the point of death? We are not told that he was brought in from his hunting trip on a stretcher by the paramedics. Rather we are told that he walked in from hunting under his own power. So how close to death could he have been? Yet Esav says to Ya'acov that he is so hungry that he was about to die.

Now, I do not know how long Esav went without food while out on his hunting trip, but I have been on a forty day fast and my wife, I have gone on many one, two and three week fasts and we have never come anywhere near the point of death. I could understand if Esav had gone without water for an extended period of time, because three days without water could have serious consequences, under normal circumstances, but food, Esav could have made it forty days with no problem.

There is no mistaking it, the passage I quoted above tells us that by exchanging his birthright for food in order to satisfy his hunger Esav despised his birthright; however, after he realized what he had done, after the reality of what it is that he sold hit him, he accuses his brother Ya'acov of scamming him.

Bereshit {27:34} When Esav heard the words of his abba (father), he cried with an exceeding great and bitter cry, and said to his abba, "Bless me, even me also, my abba." {27:35} He said, "Your brother came with deceit, and has taken away your blessing." {27:36} He said, "Is not he rightly named Ya'akov? For he has supplanted me these two times. He took away my birthright. See, now he has taken away my blessing." He said, "Have you not reserved a blessing for me?"

But the question still is, “how hungry could Esav have been?” I think that Esav's statement of being at the point of death was a hyperbole. I am sure, like me, you have said these words in your life time, “I am starving to death.” You were not really at the point of death, but you used the words to express that you were extremely hungry. Esav, I believe, was expressing the same thing. It is amazing what one will do for food, what one will do so as to satisfy their hunger, if they are not disciplined. I know that when I fast it takes a lot of discipline, self control and an amazing amount of faith in G-d for me to make it through. Why faith in G-d; because I am always fasting for a specific purpose, either for a personal need, a prayer request or as intercession on behalf of someone else. Without the faith that what I am doing will move G-d to respond I would never be able to succeed in my fast, my appetite and flesh would always have the better of me.

Today when we think of a birthright we think of an inheritance, perhaps of cash or property, but G-d, although He cares for our financial wellbeing, is more interested and concerned with our spiritual wellbeing and our relationship with Him. Therefore, when the Bible speaks about a birthright, as it does in this week's Parasha, it is speaking about Esav's spiritual condition and his personal relationship with G-d. What Esav sold was his spiritual relationship with G-d. Ya'acov may have been a schemer, but at least he was spiritual and had a relationship with G-d, which is what Scripture means when it says that, “Ya'akov was a quiet man, living in tents.” Esav was G-dless and that was his problem.

A believer's inheritance is G-d, He is our birthright. When Esav rejected his birthright he rejected G-d, something that is very evident even to us today as we experience his descendants worshipping a false god. The writer of Ivrim (Hebrews) puts it well when he says:

Ivrim {12:15} See to it that no one comes short of the grace of G-d; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled; {12:16} that there be no immoral or godless person like Esav, who sold his own birthright for a single meal.

Ask yourself today, “how important is G-d to you, and what price it would take for you to sell Him out of your life!”

*********************
Baruch HaShem
Rabbi Ya'acov Farber

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Chayei Sarah- The Life of Sarah

Chayei Sarah (Genesis 23:1-25:18)

I always find the start of this Torah portion ackward. It is the “life of Sarah”, and then the passage starts by telling us she is dead…Yes, that’s right, ladies and gentlemen, she will have no speaking parts in this Bible passage. She has left the building.
However, we do find one item of note in that. First, she is the only female who’s age is mentioned when she dies in the Bible. With men, this happens all the time, but only this one time for any women.
Next, we find the very first “invasion” of the promised land. Abraham actually owes a small piece of the promised land. Granted, it was a for a tomb, but it was still a piece of ownership. Amazingly enough, this place is still in existence. You can know a bit more about the Tomb of the Patriarchs by going to:

http://www.sacred-destinations.com/israel/hebron-tombs-of-the-patriarchs.htm



A photo from the Cenotaph of Sarah. It’s really more of a monument, their actual bones are believed to be buried in a subterranean cavern under the complex.

Any rate, the section starts off with Sarah dying, which seems at first a bit silly that we start a section of the life of Sarah with her death, but then one has to think a moment. Generally, we don’t reflect significantly on one’s life until their death. We don’t read biographies on average people until we read them in their paper in a section called “obituary”. It is at that point in time that one’s life is complete. It is at that point that people are no longer keeping the same secrets. Generally, at that point a lot (but not always all) old sins and grievances are forgiven. We tend to put a positive twist on someone’s life, in part, I think because we hope others will look to us with the same kind of gracious posture when we are gone.
So, we have the life of Sarah, and the longer picture of her life is seen through the life of her son, Isaac.

The basic chronology of the passage is as follows:
1. Death of Sarah and the purchase of the field Ephron.
2. Abraham gets his elder servant to go find a wife from among his own people.
3. The servant’s adventure in finding Rebecca.
4. Isaac and Rebecca are married.
5. Concluding comments and the death of Abraham.

Much has been written about Abraham and buying a field while grieving for his wife and how he paid way too much for this field. Even though I have been a financial advisor, I am going to avoid the temptation to write on this story.
I did receive an email this week from a rabbi talking about how this passage among others is a good argument for “not cremating” a body at death. This is not found in Scripture and “burning bodies” is generally only associated with idol worship.
There is also the passage (Gen 25:1) which I must confess has some personal importance to me. Abraham had another wife, that we know almost nothing about. He had several children that we know very little about. I ran across this passage years ago, and found it a bit amazing.
Although most people will know that I am not particularly emotional or led by charismatic visions, I have had a few. One of these was while I was in Bible college (actually Seminary). I was praying and felt distinctly that God was calling me a son of Abraham. As you can imagine, I was honoured with such a title. I had suspected this as a statement in the New Testament context when Jesus referred to a person who believed in him (having faith) as being a true son of Abraham. Just for the record, I didn’t think, nor do I think now that I am gifted with an unusual gift of Faith. I am like any other follower of the Messiah, stumbling around and wishing that God would speak more clearly, or that I would be able to understand more clearly what God is doing.
Any rate, I found this passage while studying for a Sunday School class I was teaching, and fell in love with it. There were children of Abraham who we know almost nothing about. We know about Ishmael (the father of the Muslim nations). We know about Isaac (or at least I thought I understood about Isaac), the founder of the Jewish nation (actually the father of the Children of Israel, but at the time I heard these two expressions as identical). I knew I wasn’t a Jew, now was I from Muslim stock. I was a paste white (sometimes called ghostly white) European. So, I knew that I was not genetically related to Abraham, until I saw these children.
I confided this to one brother (former Mennonite pastor) almost 9 years ago. I mentioned this communication from God and how that inspired me, and then how in Genesis, we find that there were other children of Abraham and maybe I really am one of them. He introduced me to an understanding of the “Two House” concept. That, among the kingdom of God there are many who are children of Abraham (Children of Israel) who have been scattered among the nations and the prophecy is that they would someday return. Supposed Gentiles, who will one day return to the faith of their “Fathers” (Abraham means Father). This was revolutionary to me, and sent me on a serious study path, and eventually to try to settle this question a DNA test, to find that, yes, we may very well be “Children of Abraham” in the spiritual sense and in the physical sense.

However, the part of this story that I really wanted to capture is the whole idea of setting a test for God to show His will. This is an awkward story. We have the Senior servant of Abraham with an amazing assignment. He’s going to go someplace where he knows no one (supposedly), and announce that Abraham (who people may or may not even remember) has had a son and needs a wife, and he’s going to convince her that she should leave everything for this “mysterious son”. The wedding is site unseen. She doesn’t even know if he’s a monster, but this young lady is going to trust someone she just met with one of the most important decisions of her life. Let us not forget as well, that the servant also has to use his “best judgement” to find a wife for his master’s son. How does he know he hasn’t bumped into a bridezilla?
To be honest, the task is really impossible. Can you imagine doing this in today’s age? How much more so in a world where women were not held in the same regard, where mobility (leaving a bad husband) would be almost impossible?
Yet, this is the servant’s task.
So, he arrives at the town, and of course, has no one to meet him. He goes to the well. I guess it would be a place you might bump into a young lady, and he seeks a sign from God.
The servant is there with multiple servants (Gen 24:23, and 54) we don’t know how many, but they are standing around the well, and the servant asks for someone who would give him a drink and offer to water all the camels as well. I don’t have a reference to how many camels were there. The Rabbis I have heard generally tell me 10. They always have an answer whether one can find it in the text or not.
There is also an interesting item about the water. Although the text in Hebrew says that she “drew it out for the camels”. It actually has a different phrase when she gets water the water for the servant. This is the way the KJV reads:

Gen 24:16 And the damsel was very fair to look upon, a virgin, neither had any man known her. And she went down to the fountain, and filled her pitcher, and came up.

It is this phrase “and came up” which is a bit difficult to tag. In the Talmid, it is believed that it was not Rebecca that came up (as our English reads) but the water itself that came up. If this reading is more correct, then we have the servant watching a miracle as the water bubbles up to refresh the servant. She did have to draw the water up for the camels, but there is definitely different wording about the water for the men.

Gen 24:20 And she hasted, and emptied her pitcher into the trough, and ran again unto the well to draw, and drew for all his camels.

My Hebrew is not good enough to comment as to whether I agree with the Rabbis or not, but it is easy to see that different words are used.

Now back to the idea of seeking a “sign from God”. Most of the Christian community today is not fond of the idea. It is what Gideon did to know with certainty the will of God. The children of Israel used this during the temple age, it was called the Urim and Thummim. It is what the disciples did when they replaced the office that Judas held (Ac 1:26). Some may argue that this sort of decision making was something prior to the coming of the Holy Spirit. That would be true. Yet, the reason for this is when a decision had to be made. We need information from God and we want clarity. This action was taken.
What about today? Do we ever find ourselves in a position where we lack clarity. Is there ever a time when an action has to be taken (or not taken) and no one has a clear sense of God’s leading? Why not seek a sign? Why not cast lots, throw dice, draw straws, flip a coin, or whatever.
We do believe in God’s desire to communicate his will to us. We are his servants. We have gotten used to acting based on “I feel” God’s will is such and such. If this works out, then we can say, well obviously we were following the will of God. That may or may not be true. Following God’s will is not a matter of whether it worked out or not. Maybe God intended something which on the surface would look like a failure, but would teach some incredible truth. God has done things like that. Also, what if the decision doesn’t look like it works out. Many things in my life have not worked out. Does this mean we did not hear the will of God? Does this mean we are false prophets? Does this set a crisis of faith? In truth for many people it does exactly that. I have many pastors confide with me their struggle when they had convinced themselves that they had “God’s blessing” and in fact they were chasing their own vanity.
Not that I am proposing this for every decision, but I think there are times when we should pray for God to lead through a clear “sign”, make sure there is no room for misinterpretation, and then wait…get the sign… and then act (no questioning, no turning back). I sincerely believe there is a lot more Biblical basis for this then a democratic voting system that we have decided the will of God from in most of the churches I have attended.
A dear brother of mine (Dr. Carl Hinderager) was asked about the possibility of using this sort of “sign seeking” to know direction, and he paused a moment and looked thoughtful and then said, “if it was me, I would pray that the sign would be given from my parents. I would ask God to give direction from my parents. I would commit that to prayer and then when ready call them and ask the question you are struggling with. Whatever advice they say, you accept this as God’s will. The reason for this is two fold. First, you would be seeking a sign and getting the signal, but second, you would be obeying one of the commandments “Children obey your parent’s in the Lord for this is right.” I thought that was a fair counsel on the question.

Shabbot Tov (or in English, Have a Good Sabbath “Saturday”)

Jewish Rabinical Torah Teaching

Now I know many of you won't necessarily be excited about this, but I did get a chance to listen to a few of these. I found them interesting and insightful to the passage espicially if I wanted to know what had been taught historically on a given passage. I thought I would share as well. It is "Virtual Torah Teaching"
http://www.naaleh.com/index.html